Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III Final Review Part 1 | Photographer Dustin Abbott shares his final review of the new Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM lens. The 16 I would buy the 200mm f2.0. You can use it for almost everything, while the 300mm f2.8 is more or less useless for anything else than sports and zoo photos. Starkiller's gear list: Canon EOS-1D X Canon EOS 5D Mark III Canon EF 35mm F1.4L USM Canon EF 200mm f/2L IS USM Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM +5 more.
But, if an alternative is to be considered, the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM Lens is my easy first choice. In the Sony vs. Canon 16-35mm f/2.8 Lens comparison (and mentally adjusting for the camera differences), I see the Canon turning in sharper corners at 16mm and slightly sharper corners at some of the longer focal lengths.
The Canon RF 15-35 mm f/2.8 L IS USM has a 9-bladed diaphragm and holds the same number of lens elements as the EF 16-35 mm f/2.8 L USM: 16. The lens elements have Canon’s SWC and Air Sphere Coating, and the front element has an extra treatment so that moisture and dirt don’t stick as well. The lens has a Nano-USM focusing motor.
Key Features. An impressive ultra wide-angle prime, the EF 14mm f/2.8L II USM is a Canon L-series lens well-suited for landscape, nature, and interior photography applications. Its relatively bright f/2.8 maximum aperture is well-suited to working in difficult lighting conditions and also makes this lens an ideal choice for astrophotography.

Dw bro, the run down is like this. The 16-35mm f/2.8 ii is not as sharp in the corners as the 16-35mm iii or f/4. F/2.8 will not matter for any of your specific shooting situations but astrophotography. So, having one lens just for astrophotography and another for all your WA stuffs is no big deal. I have also owned that lens and used it for astro.

7mf8e5.
  • riz9bfgg4e.pages.dev/225
  • riz9bfgg4e.pages.dev/247
  • riz9bfgg4e.pages.dev/338
  • riz9bfgg4e.pages.dev/369
  • riz9bfgg4e.pages.dev/389
  • riz9bfgg4e.pages.dev/52
  • riz9bfgg4e.pages.dev/291
  • riz9bfgg4e.pages.dev/388
  • riz9bfgg4e.pages.dev/266

    • canon ef 16 35mm f 2.8 l usm vs ii